Love Bug wrote:During my second u/s we saw three sacs, two of which were same size with fetal poles. The third one we couldn't get a good picture of. We went fir our third u/s yesterday and saw the same two with little babies and heartbeats. Again the third was smaller, and it had something in it, it just didn't look like a fetal pole and there was no heartbeat or blood flowing.
My question is three fold: is it possible for an embryo to be behind and to "catch up" later; if there is would that lead to developmental issues later in life; and does a mc of one embryo effect the other two?
I have had no bleeding or spotting at all. Would the sac just go away after a while?
There's a good chance that third one will not make it. That is not all bad news, because a twin pregnancy is much less risky than a triplet.
I have not seen any studies relating early detection of a fetal pole to health of the child at birth and afterward. Probably it has been studied.
From our data it looked like early loss of one embryo had nothing to do with loss of any others, in twin pregnancies. I have not studied triplets. I believe other researchers have concluded differently, finding the loss of one increased the chance of losing the other. If so, we did not see it in our results, so such a relationship, if any, is probably not very strong.
I don't know what happens to a tiny sac like that. I have heard (from a physician) that they can be "absorbed", but I have not studied it in any detail.
Sounds like you have a great set of twins! Possibly a triplet. Also sounds like your maternal instinct to worry about them is already hard at work. Trust me on this one - you will worry about them for all the days of the rest of your life. He's driving where??? She's dating who??? He's investing in what??? It never ends. Welcome to the world of parenting.