I just had my review appt after my failed ivf attempt in Dec 04. During the appt the consultant couldnt understand why i had 15 eggs but onlty 5 fertilised whilst reading the notes he said the embroyo;logist found that the lining to my eggs was thicker than normal therefore making it harder for the sperm to penetrate. He said therefore ICIS would be our best option now. Apparently this is the make up of my eggs and the llining would be the same on them all.
Has anyone else come across this and also does anyone know if the chances of conceiving naturally are extremly slim then?
We think we will probably be going through treatment again in April/May time.
I did not have the embryologist mention anything about the lining of my eggs, but I wanted to do a 50/50. Meaning take half of the eggs and have them naturally fertilize and do ICSI on the other half. They originally thought they were going to retrieve around 18 eggs. They only ended up retrieving 10 eggs, so they did ICSI on all of them. But I was a real proponant of natural fertilization so I was kind of bummed out. We ended up transfering 3 embryos and I am now due to have a baby girl in about 9 weeks, so maybe I am a proponant of ICSI now
Orla, I can't answer your question but I think it's positive that your doc found the reason why so few fertilised. At least you can now move forward proactively ..
Paige - OMG ! 9 weeks !! I hope you're feeling well
Sandra x
Me 41 yrs old - dh 49 yrs old. ttc 110 yrs.
1st cycle (ICSI)....Mar 04 -ve.
2nd cycle (ICSI)....Aug 04 -ve.
3rd cycle FET........May 05 -ve.
4th cycle (ICSI) ... Feb 06 -ve
5th cycle FET ..... Feb/Mar 11
9 weeks..I'm feeling pretty good. Most days like a whale with a backache..albeit a very grateful whale with a backache.
Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Years...all of the holidays made time fly by, now it's moving a little slower.
WHat is going on with you? Hopefully 05 will be great yrs for everyone.
My clinic (I'm in the U.S.) actually requires ICSI for all their patients...even if there is no evidence of a problem. They've found it to result in much better fertilization rates with no adverse consequences so see no reason not to just use whatever typically has the best outcome on the first try. I'm willing to bet you'll have much better results next time around!
Staci
Me 35/DH 41
TTC 4 years
Diagnosis: MF infertility
IVF/ICSI April 2004: -tive
FET Aug. 2004 (canceled due to cysts)
FET Jan 2005: -tive
FET Aug. 2005