Debra,
You got a much needed laugh out of me with your FHF acronym
I would say that is a very appropriate description.
On the testing early issue (sorry, this may be long!)....
I noticed on another message board for women specifically undergoing FET's that many of them also having 5 day transfers were testing at their clinics 4 or 5 days earlier than me (also with 5 day transfers). I had my transfer done days before them yet they were testing days before me. This really puzzled me so I started to do more research. These clinics are all in the U.S. so I don't know if this is being done elsewhere or not. At any rate, the reasons to test earlier seem to be:
1) There is no HCG trigger shot typically used in an FET so no need to wait for that to be out of one's system
2) In a 5 or 6 day transfer, implantation will typically take place sooner (I think generally within a day or 2 of the transfer) since the embryo is already further along in development.
3) I noticed that a lot of these women were going in for an "early beta" generally 9dp6dt or 10dp5dt. If the clinic detected any HCG, they would have them come back in a few days later for another test to see if the number had increased.
I then asked a R.E. in a question and answer forum online what the rationale might be for my clinic making me wait a full 2 weeks after the transfer when others seemed to be testing much earlier. He said that it was probably because when a test was done much earlier, it may only detect what they call a biochemical pregnancy. An embryo implants, starts making some HCG but then doesn't make it. The patient is told they have a positive (although usually based on a very low number) only to go back in for a 2nd test and get a negative result. Had the test actually been done later, it is likely that no HCG would be detected by then. Thus, the patient would be given a solid negative from the start. He thought (as my clinic obviously does as well) that is was better not to even know about a biochemical pregnancy.
I obviously can't speak for everyone and perhaps I would feel differently if it ever happened to me, but I think I would rather test as early as 9 or 10 days if I could. If a negative can be conclusive then, why subject people who do actually have negatives to 4 additional days of medications and stress?
It doesn't really seem fair to make them wait just to avoid false positives.
As far as the chemical pregnancy issue, sad as this may be I think I'd feel a little better knowing something at least tried to implant even if it didn't make it!
Anyway, I don't mean to send everyone running to their clinics for early tests. As far as I know, this only applies in the case of 5 or 6 day transfers and only in regard to FET's where no HCG is used to trigger ovulation.
Oddly enough, I had a similar dream to yours last year. I remember only because I was so incredibly disturbed by it that I wrote an entry in my journal in an effort to figure out why I would dream such a terrible thing. All I could come up with was that it just represented some hidden fear that I don't deserve to be a mother and that is why all of this is happening to me. That's the best I could do. I'm willing to bet that, between the hormones and stress all of us undergo, we probably do have some very unusual dreams.
I think I may take the award for longest posts. I type almost as fast as I talk so it's pretty easy to get carried away!
Staci